{"id":1356,"date":"2011-02-02T02:08:00","date_gmt":"2011-02-02T02:08:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.novonon.com\/blog\/2011\/02\/02\/edge-world-question-2011-what-scientific-concept-would-improve-everybodys-cognitive-toolkit\/"},"modified":"2011-02-02T02:08:00","modified_gmt":"2011-02-02T02:08:00","slug":"edge-world-question-2011-what-scientific-concept-would-improve-everybodys-cognitive-toolkit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.novonon.com\/blog\/2011\/02\/02\/edge-world-question-2011-what-scientific-concept-would-improve-everybodys-cognitive-toolkit\/","title":{"rendered":"EDGE World Question 2011: &quot;What scientific concept would improve everybody&#8217;s cognitive toolkit?&quot;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/feedproxy.google.com\/~r\/boingboing\/iBag\/~3\/23mPC9nlPks\/edgeorg-world-questi.html\">EDGE World Question 2011: &#8220;What scientific concept would improve everybody&#8217;s cognitive toolkit?&#8221;<\/a>: &#8220;<img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"kmscan725.jpg\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.boingboing.net\/2011\/01\/18\/kmscan725.jpg?w=600\" ><\/p>\n<p>Each year, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/John_Brockman_%28literary_agent%29\">\u00fcber-big-think-literary-agent<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.edge.org\/\">EDGE<\/a> founder <a href=\"http:\/\/www.edge.org\/3rd_culture\/bios\/brockman.html\">John Brockman<\/a> poses <a href=\"http:\/\/www.edge.org\/q2011\/q11_index.html\">a question<\/a>, and collects and publishes the answers. This year:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\n<strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.edge.org\/q2011\/q11_index.html\">WHAT SCIENTIFIC CONCEPT WOULD IMPROVE EVERYBODY&#8217;S COGNITIVE TOOLKIT?<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The term &#8216;scientific&#8217;is to be understood in a broad sense as the most reliable way of gaining knowledge about anything, whether it be the human spirit, the role of great people in history, or the structure of DNA. A &#8216;scientific concept&#8217; may come from philosophy, logic, economics, jurisprudence, or other analytic enterprises, as long as it is a rigorous conceptual tool that may be summed up succinctly (or &#8216;in a phrase&#8217;) but has broad application to understanding the world. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>\u2022 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.edge.org\/q2011\/q11_15.html#jardin\"><br \/>My response to the EDGE 2011 Question is here<\/a> (&#8216;Ambient Memory And The Myth Of Neutral Observation&#8217;). <\/p>\n<p>\u2022 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.edge.org\/q2011\/q11_index.html\">Here is the index<\/a> of all participants, more than 150 of them, including <a href=\"http:\/\/www.edge.org\/q2011\/q11_16.html#eno\">Brian Eno<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.edge.org\/q2011\/q11_16.html#venter\">J. Craig Venter<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.edge.org\/q2011\/q11_1.html#dysong\">George Dyson<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.edge.org\/q2011\/q11_6.html#kelly\">Kevin Kelly<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.edge.org\/q2011\/q11_6.html#shirky\">Clay Shirky<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.edge.org\/q2011\/q11_12.html#morozov\">Evgeny Morozov<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.edge.org\/q2011\/q11_7.html#stone\">Linda Stone<\/a>, and<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.edge.org\/q2011\/q11_index.html#dawkins\">Richard Dawkins<\/a> (who will be returning soon as a Boing Boing guestblogger, I&#8217;m happy to report!).<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.edge.org\/q2011\/q11_index.html#Q_news\">News coverage<\/a> so far includes: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/technology\/archive\/2011\/01\/why-were-always-living-in-the-new-normal\/69689\/\">The Atlantic<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wired.co.uk\/news\/archive\/2011-01\/18\/edge-question\">Wired UK<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.edge.org\/q2011\/q11_index.html#nyt\">New York Times<\/a>,<br \/><a href=\"http:\/\/www.edge.org\/q2011\/q11_index.html#sz\">Sueddeutsche Zeitung<br \/><\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.edge.org\/q2011\/q11_index.html#newsweek\">Newsweek<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.edge.org\/q2011\/q11_index.html#welt\">Die Welt<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.edge.org\/q2011\/q11_index.html#guardian\">The Guardian<br \/><\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.edge.org\/q2011\/q11_index.html#publico\">Publico<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><em>(Image: <em>RUDBECKIA<\/em>, Katinka Matson)<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/ads.pheedo.com\/click.phdo?s=34828612feb8933b60d14efc1ba663ec&#038;p=1\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" border=\"0\" src=\"http:\/\/ads.pheedo.com\/img.phdo?s=34828612feb8933b60d14efc1ba663ec&#038;p=1\"><\/a><br \/><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" height=\"0\" width=\"0\" border=\"0\" src=\"http:\/\/segment-pixel.invitemedia.com\/pixel?code=TechCons&#038;partnerID=167&#038;key=segment\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" height=\"0\" width=\"0\" border=\"0\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/pixel.quantserve.com\/pixel\/p-8bUhLiluj0fAw.gif?resize=0%2C0\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" height=\"0\" width=\"0\" border=\"0\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/haku.vizu.com\/a.gif?resize=0%2C0\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~r\/boingboing\/iBag\/~4\/23mPC9nlPks\" height=\"1\" width=\"1\"><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>EDGE World Question 2011: &#8220;What scientific concept would improve everybody&#8217;s cognitive toolkit?&#8221;: &#8220; Each year, \u00fcber-big-think-literary-agent and EDGE founder John Brockman poses a question, and collects and publishes the answers. This year: WHAT SCIENTIFIC CONCEPT WOULD IMPROVE EVERYBODY&#8217;S COGNITIVE TOOLKIT? The term &#8216;scientific&#8217;is to be understood in a broad sense as the most reliable way [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1356","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p3pfIY-lS","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.novonon.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1356","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.novonon.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.novonon.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.novonon.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.novonon.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1356"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.novonon.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1356\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.novonon.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1356"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.novonon.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1356"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.novonon.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1356"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}