News is bad for you – and giving up reading it will make you happier – Boing Boing

[Note: I would personally feel irresponsible to completely abandon the news — but for sure I try to keep myself out of the daily (or hourly!) churn and just get the big picture as I need it. See also the slow news movement. -egg]

News is bad for you – and giving up reading it will make you happier – Boing Boing.

Rolf Dobelli, author of the forthcoming book, The Art of Thinking Clearly, has an essay in the Guardian that explains the many reasons why you shouldn’t read, listen to, or watch news. I don’t agree with everything he says, but I found it thought-provoking.

News is toxic to your body. It constantly triggers the limbic system. Panicky stories spur the release of cascades of glucocorticoid (cortisol). This deregulates your immune system and inhibits the release of growth hormones. In other words, your body finds itself in a state of chronic stress. High glucocorticoid levels cause impaired digestion, lack of growth (cell, hair, bone), nervousness and susceptibility to infections. The other potential side-effects include fear, aggression, tunnel-vision and desensitization.

News makes us passive. News stories are overwhelmingly about things you cannot influence. The daily repetition of news about things we can’t act upon makes us passive. It grinds us down until we adopt a worldview that is pessimistic, desensitised, sarcastic and fatalistic. The scientific term is “learned helplessness”. It’s a bit of a stretch, but I would not be surprised if news consumption, at least partially contributes to the widespread disease of depression.

News is bad for you – and giving up reading it will make you happier

test post

IMG_6645-copy-2_o_8101.jpg

I have no idea if FDRL’s "Maple Set" knives are practical or even useful, but they are extremely beautiful.

With this project we wanted to explore an alternative emotion to the standard kitchen knives you see every day. The focus is drawn to the high polished blade, while the rest of the knife’s Maple wood body sits warmly in the hand and blends in to its surroundings. The wood is sealed and food safe to allow for easy cleanup. The knife gives the appearance of being lightweight; however their weight is balanced to ensure that they can be used by any level of chef.

Lenticular Street Art by Roa feedly

Lenticular Street Art by Roa
http://www.thisiscolossal.com/2013/04/lenticular-street-art-by-roa/?utm_source=feedly&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+colossal+(Colossal)

500+ Colossal by Christopher Jobson / 19h // keep unread // preview
Lenticular Street Art by Roa

ab-actions.pngab-evernote.pngab-instapaper.pngab-pocket.pngDelicious

pixel.png

TwitterLinkedInFacebookBufferMailpixel.png

+Tag

Lenticular Street Art by Roa street art

Lenticular Street Art by Roa street art

Lenticular Street Art by Roa street art

Lenticular Street Art by Roa street art

Lenticular Street Art by Roa street art

Lenticular Street Art by Roa street art

Lenticular Street Art by Roa street art

Lenticular Street Art by Roa street art

Back in 2009 artist Roa (previously here and here) painted this amazing lenticular street artwork on Curtain Road in London. Depending on the angle of viewing the art shifts between the fuzzy exterior of a rabbit to an illustrated interior of its circulatory system, a trick he used late last year here in Chicago to pretty gruesome effect. You can see much more of Roa’s work over on Flickrwhich seems to be updated most frequently. (via twisted sifter)

via feedly.com

PSA: Ignore the news

[IMPORTANT. -egg]

PSA: Ignore the news
http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2013/04/psa-ignore-the-news.html?utm_source=feedly

Just a brief reminder that news is bad for you. No, seriously: publicly available news media in the 21st century exist solely to get eyeballs on advertisements. That is its only real purpose. The real news consists of dull but informative reports circulated by consultancies giving in-depth insight into what’s going on. The sort of stuff you find digested in the inside pages of The Economist. All else is comics. As there’s an arms race going on between advertising sales departments, the major news outlets are constantly trying to make their product more addictive. And like most other addictive substance, news is adepressant, one fine-tuned to make you keep coming back for more.

When a particular incident like today’s bombing of the Boston marathon kicks off a news cycle, a common pattern asserts itself. First, there’s photographic evidence and rumour. Then there’s some initial information—immediate numbers of dead and injured, scary photographs. But the amount of new information coming out tapers off rapidly after the first hour or two, and gives way to rumour and speculation. There probably won’t be any meaningful updates for a couple of days: but the TV channels and newpapers have to fill the dead air somehow, to keep the eyeballs they’ve attracted on the advertisements, so they cobble together anything they can grab—usually talking heads speculating without benefit of actual information. Such speculation in turn increases anxiety levels and causes depression, bringing the onlookers back for more.

Which is why I am about to back away from the keyboard, stop looking for more updated news from Boston, and go swimming. Terrible though the bombings may be, we won’t learn anything significant about the responsible parties for some time: and in the meantime I see no reason to allow my emotional state to be manipulated for the benefit of advertisers. (And neither should you, unless you’re a Bostonian or a relative or friend of someone directly affected, in which case, you have my deepest sympathy. This goes for you, Dan.)

Update: And here’s Bruce Schneier with some words of sense.